This control enhancement is implemented within the remote device (e.g., notebook/laptop computer) via configuration settings not configurable by the user of the device. An example of a non-remote communications path from a remote device is a virtual private network (VPN). When a non-remote connection is established using a VPN, the configuration settings prevent split-tunneling. Split-tunneling might otherwise be used by remote users to communicate with the information system as an extension of the system and to communicate with local resources, such as a printer or file server. Since the remote device, when connected by a non-remote connection, becomes an extension of the information system allowing dual communications paths, such as split-tunneling, in effect allowing unauthorized external connections into the system. This is a split-tunneling requirement that can be controlled via the operating system by disabling interfaces.
Rationale for non-applicability: The use of commercial mobile devices as personal hotspots to connect to DoD networks is a critical user functionality. This configuration enables routing between the VPN traffic on one interface and authenticated client device access on another interface. A prohibition on split-tunneling would disable this feature. Strong authentication of remote network connections mitigates the risk that an unauthorized process on the non-VPN interface will be able to access the VPN interface. |